• SEO是一个到底多么牛叉的行业?SEO是一个到底多么牛叉的行业?
  • 郑州SEO郑州seo
  • 郑州SEO你只看到了别人的成功,却看不到别人默默的
  • 郑州SEOSEO切莫浪费时间在不必要的问题上
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Google搜索质量评分指南正式发布,需要的可以来看看

时间:2013-3-3 作者:问候seo

这种文件最好看英文原文,最准确。翻译版本或多或少会有损失。就连Google中文官方网站上的一些帮助文件在从英文翻译过来时也不是非常准确。

以后有时间的话我来翻译一下(只能翻译这个公开的版本),虽然已经有人翻译了,不过我相信,只有seo翻译的才是最准确Google搜索质量评分指南正式发布,需要的可以来看看

Google relies on raters, working in countries and languages around the world, to help us measure the quality of our
search results, ranking, and search experience. These raters perform a variety of different kinds of “rating tasks”
designed to give us information about the quality of different kinds of results in response to different kinds of
queries. The data they generate is rolled up statistically to give us within the Google search team a view of the quality
of our search results and search experience over time, as well as an ability to measure the effect of proposed changes
to Google’s search algorithms. Raters’ judgments do not directly impact Google’s search result rankings. While a
rater may give a particular URL a score, that score does not directly increase or decrease a given website’s ranking.
Instead these scores are used in aggregate to evaluate search quality and make decisions about changes.
This document is a “Cliff’s Notes” version of our search quality rating guidelines. By this, we mean that it is not the
entire version that raters use on a daily basis; however, it is a summary of the important topics. The raters’ version
includes instruction on using the rating interface, additional rating examples, etc. These guidelines are used as rating
specifications for search raters, and this document in particular focuses on a core type of rating task called “URL
rating.” In a URL rating task, a rater is shown a search query from their locale (country + language) and a URL that
could be returned by a search engine for that query. The raters “rate” the quality of that result for that query, on a
scale described within the document. Sounds simple, right? As you’ll see, there are many cases to think through, and
this document is used to guide raters on some of those cases and how to look at them.
Our search quality rating guidelines are in constant flux as we learn and search evolves over time. We’ve created this
version especially for those individuals who want to understand better how Google thinks about relevance and quality
of search results.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:1448228637@qq.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。